The Second Amendment states, “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”
What part of it says that “a well-regulated militia” excludes a well-regulated gun ownership? No spin of this amendment can justify the right to bear war weapons against unarmed kids and all citizens. Closed case! Enough with the fake arguments and false rhetoric. The only ones who really object to background checks and regulation are nuts, criminals and people with something to hide. Honest people have nothing to hide.
Jude Smallwood, Royal Palm Beach