Pafford To Hold District 86 Town Hall Meeting May 30

State Rep. Mark Pafford (D-District 86) will host a town hall meeting Thursday, May 30 to discuss the 2013 legislative session.

The purpose of the meeting is to provide an opportunity to hear firsthand about critical issues facing Florida, and to offer the public a chance to provide feedback.

The discussion will also include some information about how to be a better advocate for the legislative session in 2014. A question-and-answer session will follow the presentation.

The meeting will be held from 6 to 7:30 p.m. in the auditorium of Keiser University, located at 2085 Vista Parkway in West Palm Beach.

The town hall is open to the public and all are welcome and encouraged to attend.

3 COMMENTS

  1. Fathers & Families

    http://www.fathersandfamilies.org

    Fathers and Families promotes an ambitious legislative agenda and has helped pass family court reform legislation in over two dozen states. Click the tabs to view information about Fathers and Families’ current and recent legislative projects. To learn more about our legislative and other achievemen

  2. I strongly urge all to support alimony reform to abolish permanent alimony. At the conclusion of a divorce both parties should walk away in an equitable manner. Prior to the marriage they were individuals with separate lives, during marriage they merged, and upon divorce they should be allowed to return to their separate lives. One should not leave the marriage permanently tethered to the other. One should not reap the benefits of a free lifetime of alimony, while the other spends a lifetime wearing a financial yoke. By providing permanent alimony, Florida’s law today does just that. The current law rewards one spouse at the expense of the other. It took two people to make the marriage, and two people to make the divorce. In Florida, a no-fault divorce state, the permanent alimony provision certainly runs counter to the fairness and equality that is the spirit of the law, punishing the person forced to make lifetime alimony payments. It’s not fair. It’s not right. It needs to change!

  3. We need alimony reform in Florida. This is what Texas has done with their alimony law and what Florida should follow exactly as well. Texas Expands Alimony
    July 5th, 2011
    Spousal support law continues to evolve in Texas; but like the hot, dry summer days which seem to creep along, the process moves slowly.
    Governor Rick Perry signed HB 901 on June 17, 2011. The law is effective for divorce cases filed on or after September 1, 2011. In 1995, Texas was the 50th state to pass a law providing for spousal support and has been one of the most restrictive in the nation.
    The new law provides potentially increased relief to spouses who have been out of the work force, are disabled, are victims of family violence or are the primary custodians of a disabled child.
    Major changes to the spousal support law are:
    1. The maximum amount of spousal support that courts may award increases from $2,500 to $5,000.00 per month, although still limited to 20 percent of the payer’s average gross monthly income.
    2. The duration of spousal support is extended from a maximum of 3 years to a maximum of 5, 7 or 10 years, generally depending on the length of the marriage.
    3. The law clarifies that if a person has primary care for a disabled child, the custodial parent may be prevented because of the child’s disability from earning sufficient income to meet the custodial parent’s minimum reasonable needs.
    4. The law also clarifies that a person may not be held in contempt for failing to pay spousal support which is in an agreed order and extends beyond the period of time provided under the law.
    In order to receive “maintenance,” (which is the statutory term for spousal support), the spouse seeking support must lack sufficient property to provide for the spouse’s “minimum reasonable needs”, AND one of the following:
    (1) The recipient must be unable to earn sufficient income to provide for his or her minimum reasonable needs because of an incapacitating mental or physical disability;
    (2) The marriage lasted for 10 years or longer and the recipient lacks the ability to earn sufficient income to provide for his or her minimum reasonable needs;
    (3) The recipient is the custodian of a child of the marriage of any age who required substantial care and personal supervision because of a physical or mental disability that prevents the spouse from earning sufficient income to provide for the spouse’s minimum reasonable needs; OR

    (4) The person ordered to pay support must have been convicted of or received deferred jurisdiction for an act of family violence during the pendency of the suit or within two years of the date the suit is filed.
    Under the previous law, under most circumstances, the court could only order maintenance for a maximum of three years, regardless of the length of the marriage. Under the new law, the court can order maintenance to continue for:
    (1) 5 years if the parties were married less than 10 years and the maintenance is awarded due to family violence;
    (2) 5 years if the parties were married more than 10 years, but less than 20 years.
    (3) 7 years if the parties were married more than 20 years, but less than 30 years;
    (4) 10 years if the parties were married for more than 30 years.
    In cases where the maintenance is awarded due to the mental or physical disability of the spouse or a child of the marriage, the court may order that the maintenance continue as long as the disability continues.
    However, in all circumstances, the law provides that the Court shall order maintenance for the shortest reasonable period that allows the recipient to earn sufficient income to meet his or her reasonable needs.
    If you are contemplating dissolving your marriage and have questions concerning your financial future, seek competent legal counsel to help you determine whether you could be eligible for spousal support under the expanded provisions of the new law.

Comments are closed.