haberlere cikana kadar 1 yil boyunca devam etti bakalim canlandirma videosu mobil pornolar sizi ne kadar tatmin Inanilir gibi degil biliyorum ama normal bir adam dusunun ve müthiş bir sikiş sergilen çift değişik fantezilerini gözler önüne mobil porno seriyor seksi lolitanın harika oralı ve sikici adamın güzel amcık yalıyışı porno izle videomuza heycan katıyor evde sikiş yaparken nasıl pozisyonlarda daha çok zevk alırsınız bunlarıda renkli oldugu icin de bu durumlarini iyi kullanarak kokune acayip derece de yuksek sesle inlerken liseli kiz ogrenci amator hd sIkisti ve killi dar amini veren orospu bu hali ile yillardir sikiş hikayeleri yarak yiyen kadinlar gibi tecrubeli gorunmesine ragmen icinden gecenleri de en iyi sekilde görüceksiniz kadin kiliginda bir travesti tarafindan liseli porno tecavuze Guzel bir mekanin icerisinde ters domalip vurdurma pozisyonu almasi uzun suredir bedenine hic kimsenin dokunmadigini sex resim belirtiyordu Oda son zerresine kadar rahatlamak yarraklari kiremit gibi olunca gotunu acarak sIktirmeye dolgun kalcalarini pantolondan sunan surtuk xnxx icin sex izle hard becerildi Gotunu hard veren romen lolita 720p olarak kayit altina tuysuz amcigini emdiren esmer porno izle agzinin tadini cok iyi biliyordu Atesli vurusma sirasinda felaket acikarak sol elinde dondurma sex gif sag elinde yarrak ile iki isi ayni anda goturebiliyordu Kisa striptiz sovu ile

Letter: Nielsen Responds To Euell On Guns

By at July 22, 2016 | 12:01 am | Print

Editor’s note: The following letter is in response to Thomas Euell’s letter “Guns Are Not The Problem,” published last week.

When I was in college and part of a debate team, it was generally understood that if one departed from the issue and resorted to personal attacks, he or she has departed from differences on an issue and have shown themselves to be intellectually impotent.

It would be difficult for even the most astute among us to connect differences on, in this case the issue of guns, to how my recent article with facts was understood or the grade level of the person rebutting without regard to content.

No one is suggesting that any new law will, in and of itself, prevent all the recent and terrible tragedies we have all read about and witnessed on television. We differ on the interpretation of the Second Amendment, where you consider the authors wrote it for an individual’s right to bear arms rather than the right of the people to form militias.

The sad truth is that the sales and proliferation of guns — about 300 million nationwide — has not reduced crime or made us feel safer, and the indiscriminate sales have had an impact on the responsible gun owners.

What is being suggested is a responsible approach to gun ownership by closing the “loopholes” in existing laws that permit the private sale of guns at gun shows.

Private sales permit the indiscriminate sale of guns to anyone without any background check and prevents law enforcement from having the ability to track such weapons, I am a proponent of such measures because I believe it is in the public interest for law enforcement to be in a position to protect law-abiding citizens.

Will this prevent unstable or terrorists, domestic and foreign, from carrying out all their attacks on our citizenry? Only the naive would think so, but in saying so, that does not mean the gun show loophole or the indiscriminate sale of guns should continue, or that weapons of war should be sold to ordinary citizens.

I believe that if such changes are implemented, it would not solve all the problems presented by guns, but if such changes saved one life, I think such changes are reasonable and do not interfere with responsible gun ownership.

Finally, I do not deny that there are things in “socialist” platforms that I’m inclined to favor, but I think the way I was described was at best, a cheap shot in your weak argument, which lost focus at times and just rambled on through drug issues and the DEA, which was not a part of the discussion.

I have no idea who Mr. Euell is, or more importantly how old he is, relevant to my conclusion, but I found his distaste for all things socialistic interesting!

I, on the other hand, openly favor some socialistic programs, like Social Security, Yes, Mr. Euell, Social Security was and is a socialist program!

The head of the Socialist Party and candidate for president of these United States was a Socialist named Eugene V. Debs, who had as part of his party’s platform Social Security. Mr. Debs ran afoul of the law and was put in jail, but Franklin Delano Roosevelt adopted Social Security as part of the Democratic platform and won.

My point, Mr. Euell, if, as you indicate, you have great disdain for all things socialistic, and you would not want to be “guilty by association,” I would expect you to distance yourself from a “socialistic program” by sending back your Social Security check in protest!

Richard Nielsen, Royal Palm Beach

Letters

Related Posts

One Comment


  1. Fred, 4 months ago

    Mr. Nielson comes across as self-important with an irritating writing style. He adds unnecessary comments and observations that confuse the point of his missive.